|
In
the next few years we will see more security technology being
developed and deployed. We will have to make difficult choices
about when and where these technologies should be applied. Cryptography,
for example, can be used to protect information and information
systems by assuring privacy and data integrity. It is a means
to identify or authenticate people in various roles. Using cryptography
generally increases the security of computers regardless of who
they belong to. Computer and network security technology protects
the computers of both the “good guys” and the “bad guys.” Should
citizens and American businesses be allowed to harden their systems
(and protect them from intruders including the government), or
should only the government be allowed to use cryptography? The
National Academy of Science studied this, and its conclusions
are in the book Cryptography’s Role in Securing the Information
Society (www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/crisis).
Ghandi, King, and Mandela are inspiring examples
that no system or technology can withstand human resolve and determination
forever. Information technology increasingly binds us together
by making it ever more difficult for any of us to say, “I didn’t
know.”
Whether information technology brings us
closer so we can live together more effectively or merely highlights
our differences is our choice to make. Deciding to live together
peacefully is an age-old choice, with technology magnifying the
consequences. I hope we choose wisely.
Meredith Professor Shiu-Kai Chin ’75,
G’78, G’86 teaches in the Department of Electrical Engineering
and Computer Science and is director of the CASE Center. He has
worked with the Information Warfare Branch at the Information
Directorate of the Air Force Research Lab in Rome, New York, and
is a commissioner on the Onondaga County/City of Syracuse Human
Rights Commission.
|
|
Furthering
Advanced Technologies
The
terrible events of September 11 were a somber reminder that
the research we do in the Center for Natural Language Processing—creating
technology that enables computers to have a human-like understanding
of language for use in mining databases—is for a very real
purpose. While such advanced information technologies as
ours have been successful in providing advance warning and
have foiled other terrorist attempts, it is horrible to
think that evidence of the September 11 terrorists’ plans
was not detected. Renewed commitment to improving advanced
technologies is one outcome I see. The other necessary outcome
must be increased attention to the qualifications of employees
at strategic points who are the vital linchpin in the process
of protecting human life. Technology can only do so much,
the human aspect is outside of technology’s control.
—
Elizabeth D. Liddy G’77, G’88, professor,
School of Information Studies; director, Center for
Natural Language Processing
|
|