AP/Wide
World Photos
Heightened security measures
extend the time it takes to pass through U.S. border crossings,
such as this one in Blaine, Washington.
|
Ingraham
would like to see many of the Hart-Rudman suggestions enacted
immediately, including full cabinet status for the Office of
Homeland Security. Though mindful of the potential dangers that
large concentrations of power can present in a democracy, She
is thoroughly convinced of the necessity of creating an agency
with powers broad enough to supercede entrenched Washington
bureaucracies. “The CIA and the FBI, to name two crucial examples,
are agencies that have not been receptive to change or to formal
coordination,” she says. “Neither has adapted to the new conditions
brought about by terrorist threats; until now, neither has had
to. Both of them, along with the State Department, the Coast
Guard, Immigration and Naturalization, Customs, and the Border
Patrol—at least a dozen organizations—must be made to behave
in different ways than they have in the past by an authority
capable of leading them. This is a significant problem that
has to be addressed forcefully. Mere ‘coordination’ of these
agencies is not enough to get what the president, Congress,
and, I think, the vast majority of Americans want done.”
According to Ingraham, the Maxwell School’s
public administration curriculum anticipates problems of this
nature. “We stress these kinds of questions in our public administration
classes,” she says. “How does one bring about change in large,
well-established agencies in a predictable and effective way?
How does one reform organizations that really don’t have any
particular incentive to reform? The current crisis adds a huge
new emphasis for us and a huge new way of framing these questions.”
|